PITCHER MATCHUP

Jack Perkins vs Pittsburgh Pirates

How the Pittsburgh Pirates's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jack Perkins's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jack Perkins's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .309vs RHH xwOBA .302Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Sweeper 29%Changeup 16%Cutter 14%Sinker 4%Unknown 2%Slider 2%

How the Pittsburgh Pirates's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Pittsburgh Pirates's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jack Perkins, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 BR Bryan Reynolds SH .357
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryan Reynolds
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 555 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 BL Brandon Lowe SH .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 391 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 NG Nick Gonzales RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Gonzales
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JM Jake Mangum SH .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Mangum
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 RO Ryan O'Hearn LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan O'Hearn
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 444 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 SH Spencer Horwitz LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Horwitz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 412 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 OC Oneil Cruz LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oneil Cruz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 371 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .400 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JT Jared Triolo RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Triolo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 374 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 KG Konnor Griffin RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Konnor Griffin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.