PITCHER MATCHUP

Jack Perkins vs Miami Marlins

How the Miami Marlins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jack Perkins's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jack Perkins's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .287vs RHH xwOBA .303Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 39%Sweeper 32%Changeup 14%Cutter 11%Unknown 3%Sinker 2%Slider 1%

How the Miami Marlins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Miami Marlins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jack Perkins, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 OL Otto Lopez RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Otto Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .232 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 XE Xavier Edwards SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xavier Edwards
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 430 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JM Jakob Marsee LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jakob Marsee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 LH Liam Hicks LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Liam Hicks
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 KS Kyle Stowers LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Stowers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 OC Owen Caissie LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Owen Caissie
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JS Javier Sanoja RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Sanoja
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HH Heriberto Hernández RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heriberto Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JM Joe Mack LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joe Mack
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-03 game page →