PITCHER MATCHUP

Jack Perkins vs Miami Marlins

How the Miami Marlins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jack Perkins's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jack Perkins's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .310vs RHH xwOBA .303Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 36%Sweeper 30%Changeup 16%Cutter 12%Sinker 2%Unknown 2%Slider 1%

How the Miami Marlins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Miami Marlins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jack Perkins, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 OL Otto Lopez RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Otto Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 358 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .233 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 XE Xavier Edwards SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xavier Edwards
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 460 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JM Jakob Marsee LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jakob Marsee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JS Javier Sanoja RHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Sanoja
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 HH Heriberto Hernández RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heriberto Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 OC Owen Caissie LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Owen Caissie
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JM Joe Mack LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joe Mack
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 GC Griffin Conine LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Griffin Conine
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 LJ Leo Jiménez RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Leo Jiménez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.