PITCHER MATCHUP

Jack Perkins vs Seattle Mariners

How the Seattle Mariners's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jack Perkins's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jack Perkins's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .306vs RHH xwOBA .300Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 34%Sweeper 30%Changeup 15%Cutter 14%Sinker 3%Unknown 2%Slider 2%

How the Seattle Mariners's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Seattle Mariners's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jack Perkins, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 JR Julio Rodríguez RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Julio Rodríguez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 471 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 403 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CY Cole Young LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JN Josh Naylor LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Naylor
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 514 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 RA Randy Arozarena RHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randy Arozarena
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 564 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 360 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 TW Taylor Ward RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Taylor Ward
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 551 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 DC Dominic Canzone LHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dominic Canzone
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CR Cal Raleigh SH .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cal Raleigh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 617 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .402 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 JC J.P. Crawford LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.P. Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 511 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 VR Victor Robles RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Robles
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.