PITCHER MATCHUP

Jack Perkins vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jack Perkins's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jack Perkins's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .309vs RHH xwOBA .302Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Sweeper 29%Changeup 16%Cutter 14%Sinker 4%Unknown 2%Slider 2%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jack Perkins, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 514 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 432 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 SK Steven Kwan LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 664 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JR José Ramírez SH .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Ramírez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 345 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 NL Nathaniel Lowe LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathaniel Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 593 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AM Angel Martínez SH .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Angel Martínez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 317 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 PB Patrick Bailey SH .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Patrick Bailey
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-20 game page →