PITCHER MATCHUP

Jack Perkins vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jack Perkins's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jack Perkins's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .306vs RHH xwOBA .307Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 32%Sweeper 29%Changeup 16%Cutter 15%Sinker 4%Slider 2%Unknown 2%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jack Perkins, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 542 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 SK Steven Kwan LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 690 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 349 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 453 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JR José Ramírez SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Ramírez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 507 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 361 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AM Angel Martínez SH .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Angel Martínez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 KM Kyle Manzardo LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Manzardo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 PB Patrick Bailey SH .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Patrick Bailey
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 419 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.