PITCHER MATCHUP

Jack Perkins vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jack Perkins's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jack Perkins's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .298vs RHH xwOBA .307Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 38%Sweeper 31%Changeup 15%Cutter 11%Unknown 2%Sinker 2%Slider 1%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jack Perkins, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .351
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 488 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 579 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 417 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 LG Lourdes Gurriel Jr. RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lourdes Gurriel Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 422 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JB Jorge Barrosa SH .278
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Barrosa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .241 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-21 game page →