PITCHER MATCHUP

Jack Perkins vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jack Perkins's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jack Perkins's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .306vs RHH xwOBA .300Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 34%Sweeper 30%Changeup 15%Cutter 14%Sinker 3%Unknown 2%Slider 2%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jack Perkins, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 622 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 571 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 442 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .235 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TT Tim Tawa RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 397 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JF Jose Fernandez RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Fernandez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.