PITCHER MATCHUP

Jack Perkins vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jack Perkins's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jack Perkins's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .298vs RHH xwOBA .307Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 38%Sweeper 31%Changeup 15%Cutter 11%Unknown 2%Sinker 2%Slider 1%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jack Perkins, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 522 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 471 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 371 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC Jackson Chourio SH .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 393 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 370 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 387 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .281
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .242 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 360 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .234 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.