PITCHER MATCHUP

Jack Perkins vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jack Perkins's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jack Perkins's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .306vs RHH xwOBA .307Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 32%Sweeper 29%Changeup 16%Cutter 15%Sinker 4%Slider 2%Unknown 2%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jack Perkins, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 603 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 537 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 422 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 459 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 347 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 363 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 429 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 440 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 SF Sal Frelick LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 537 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.