PITCHER MATCHUP

Jack Perkins vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jack Perkins's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jack Perkins's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .309vs RHH xwOBA .302Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Sweeper 29%Changeup 16%Cutter 14%Sinker 4%Unknown 2%Slider 2%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jack Perkins, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 570 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 508 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 397 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 435 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 402 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 420 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 SF Sal Frelick LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 524 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DH David Hamilton LHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.