PITCHER MATCHUP

Jack Perkins vs Toronto Blue Jays

How the Toronto Blue Jays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jack Perkins's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jack Perkins's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .306vs RHH xwOBA .302Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 34%Sweeper 30%Changeup 15%Cutter 14%Sinker 3%Unknown 2%Slider 2%

How the Toronto Blue Jays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Toronto Blue Jays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jack Perkins, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 EC Ernie Clement SH .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ernie Clement
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 389 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KO Kazuma Okamoto RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kazuma Okamoto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vladimir Guerrero Jr. RHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vladimir Guerrero Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 441 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 444 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 AG Andrés Giménez LHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrés Giménez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 436 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GS George Springer RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. George Springer
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 428 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 358 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 NL Nathan Lukes LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Lukes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JS Jesús Sánchez LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jesús Sánchez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 406 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MS Myles Straw RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Myles Straw
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AK Alejandro Kirk RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alejandro Kirk
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-08 game page →