PITCHER MATCHUP

Jack Perkins vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jack Perkins's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jack Perkins's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .300vs RHH xwOBA .304Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 37%Sweeper 30%Changeup 16%Cutter 11%Sinker 3%Unknown 2%Slider 1%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jack Perkins, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 418 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JA Jo Adell RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 459 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MT Mike Trout RHB .358
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JS Jorge Soler RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Soler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .279
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 JL Josh Lowe LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 WM Wade Meckler LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.