PITCHER MATCHUP

Jack Perkins vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jack Perkins's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jack Perkins's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .306vs RHH xwOBA .307Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 32%Sweeper 29%Changeup 16%Cutter 15%Sinker 4%Slider 2%Unknown 2%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jack Perkins, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 479 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .353
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 535 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JL Josh Lowe LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.