PITCHER MATCHUP

Jack Perkins vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jack Perkins's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jack Perkins's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .309vs RHH xwOBA .302Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Sweeper 29%Changeup 16%Cutter 14%Sinker 4%Unknown 2%Slider 2%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jack Perkins, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 467 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 340 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 511 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .281
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.