PITCHER MATCHUP

Jack Perkins vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jack Perkins's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jack Perkins's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .275vs RHH xwOBA .320Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 40%Sweeper 31%Changeup 13%Cutter 11%Unknown 3%Sinker 1%Slider 1%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jack Perkins, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 419 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 ZN Zach Neto RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 392 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 MT Mike Trout RHB .360
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 479 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .246 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .275
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DW Donovan Walton LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Donovan Walton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-21 game page →