PITCHER MATCHUP

Jack Perkins vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jack Perkins's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jack Perkins's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .300vs RHH xwOBA .304Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 37%Sweeper 30%Changeup 16%Cutter 11%Sinker 3%Unknown 2%Slider 1%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jack Perkins, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 418 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 317 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JA Jo Adell RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 458 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MT Mike Trout RHB .359
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JS Jorge Soler RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Soler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .278
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 JL Josh Lowe LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 WM Wade Meckler LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.