PITCHER MATCHUP

Ian Seymour vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ian Seymour's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ian Seymour's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .251vs RHH xwOBA .321Seasons 2026–2025
Changeup 32%Four-Seam Fastball 27%Sweeper 15%Cutter 11%Sinker 11%Slider 3%Curveball 1%Unknown 1%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ian Seymour, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Changeup (32% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 524 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BR Ben Rice LHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Changeup (32% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .404 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Changeup (32% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 464 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC José Caballero RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Changeup (32% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TG Trent Grisham LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Changeup (32% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 380 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Changeup (32% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 416 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Changeup (32% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 467 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AW Austin Wells LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Changeup (32% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AR Amed Rosario RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Amed Rosario
    • Changeup (32% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-07 game page →