PITCHER MATCHUP

Ian Seymour vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ian Seymour's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ian Seymour's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .282vs RHH xwOBA .307Seasons 2026–2025
Changeup 31%Four-Seam Fastball 28%Sweeper 17%Sinker 11%Cutter 8%Slider 4%Curveball 1%Unknown 1%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ian Seymour, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (17% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 500 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (17% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (17% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 TG Trent Grisham LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 426 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (17% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 416 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (17% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC José Caballero RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 345 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (17% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 440 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (17% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 491 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (17% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AW Austin Wells LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 341 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (17% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.