PITCHER MATCHUP

Ian Seymour vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ian Seymour's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ian Seymour's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .278vs RHH xwOBA .305Seasons 2026–2025
Changeup 29%Four-Seam Fastball 28%Sweeper 16%Sinker 14%Cutter 7%Slider 5%Curveball 1%Unknown 1%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ian Seymour, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .402 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 355 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 586 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TG Trent Grisham LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 443 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 JC José Caballero RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AW Austin Wells LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 369 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.