PITCHER MATCHUP

Ian Seymour vs Colorado Rockies

How the Colorado Rockies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ian Seymour's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ian Seymour's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .272vs RHH xwOBA .303Seasons 2026–2025
Changeup 30%Four-Seam Fastball 28%Sweeper 16%Sinker 13%Cutter 7%Slider 5%Curveball 1%Unknown 1%

How the Colorado Rockies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Colorado Rockies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ian Seymour, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 363 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 HG Hunter Goodman RHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Goodman
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 367 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 448 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 MM Mickey Moniak LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mickey Moniak
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 KK Kyle Karros RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Karros
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 CN Connor Norby RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Connor Norby
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 CC Cole Carrigg SH .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Carrigg
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.