PITCHER MATCHUP

Ian Seymour vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ian Seymour's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ian Seymour's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .287vs RHH xwOBA .308Seasons 2026–2025
Changeup 29%Four-Seam Fastball 28%Sweeper 16%Sinker 14%Cutter 6%Slider 5%Curveball 1%Unknown 1%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ian Seymour, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 508 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JW James Wood LHB .357
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .410 xwOBA over 453 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 JY Jacob Young RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 358 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DC Dylan Crews RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 BH Brady House RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.