PITCHER MATCHUP

Ian Seymour vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ian Seymour's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ian Seymour's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .272vs RHH xwOBA .303Seasons 2026–2025
Changeup 30%Four-Seam Fastball 28%Sweeper 16%Sinker 13%Cutter 7%Slider 5%Curveball 1%Unknown 1%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ian Seymour, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 499 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JW James Wood LHB .357
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .414 xwOBA over 441 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 JY Jacob Young RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 354 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DC Dylan Crews RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 BH Brady House RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.