PITCHER MATCHUP

Ian Seymour vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ian Seymour's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ian Seymour's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .285vs RHH xwOBA .298Seasons 2026–2025
Changeup 31%Four-Seam Fastball 28%Sweeper 17%Sinker 11%Cutter 9%Slider 3%Curveball 1%Unknown 1%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ian Seymour, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 JW James Wood LHB .353
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .413 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (17% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .402 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 DL Daylen Lile LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (17% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CA CJ Abrams LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 460 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (17% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (17% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JY Jacob Young RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (17% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (17% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 DC Dylan Crews RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (17% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (17% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JT José Tena LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Tena
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (17% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (9% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.