PITCHER MATCHUP

Ian Seymour vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ian Seymour's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ian Seymour's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .244vs RHH xwOBA .337Seasons 2026–2025
Changeup 32%Four-Seam Fastball 27%Sweeper 13%Cutter 13%Sinker 10%Slider 3%Unknown 1%Curveball 1%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ian Seymour, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Changeup (32% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JW James Wood LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Changeup (32% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .401 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 CA CJ Abrams LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Changeup (32% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 421 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Changeup (32% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JY Jacob Young RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Changeup (32% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Changeup (32% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CM Curtis Mead RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Curtis Mead
    • Changeup (32% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Changeup (32% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Changeup (32% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-20 game page →