PITCHER MATCHUP

Ian Seymour vs New York Mets

How the New York Mets's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ian Seymour's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ian Seymour's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .282vs RHH xwOBA .301Seasons 2026–2025
Changeup 29%Four-Seam Fastball 28%Sweeper 16%Sinker 14%Cutter 6%Slider 5%Curveball 1%Unknown 1%

How the New York Mets's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Mets's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ian Seymour, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .329
  1. 1 BB Bo Bichette RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bo Bichette
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 371 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CB Carson Benge LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Benge
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 MS Marcus Semien RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcus Semien
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 534 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 AE A.J. Ewing LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. A.J. Ewing
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BB Brett Baty LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brett Baty
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 382 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 FL Francisco Lindor SH .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Lindor
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 638 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JS Juan Soto LHB .389
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Juan Soto
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .434 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 FA Francisco Alvarez RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Alvarez
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JY Jared Young LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Young
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.