PITCHER MATCHUP

Ian Seymour vs Seattle Mariners

How the Seattle Mariners's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ian Seymour's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ian Seymour's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .259vs RHH xwOBA .312Seasons 2026–2025
Changeup 31%Four-Seam Fastball 27%Sweeper 16%Sinker 11%Cutter 10%Slider 3%Curveball 1%Unknown 1%

How the Seattle Mariners's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Seattle Mariners's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ian Seymour, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 JN Josh Naylor LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Naylor
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 474 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CY Cole Young LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Young
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 RA Randy Arozarena RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randy Arozarena
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 517 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC J.P. Crawford LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.P. Crawford
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 493 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CR Cal Raleigh SH .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cal Raleigh
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 563 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .418 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 LR Luke Raley LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Raley
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DC Dominic Canzone LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dominic Canzone
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 CE Colt Emerson LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colt Emerson
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MG Mitch Garver RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mitch Garver
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-12 game page →