PITCHER MATCHUP

Ian Seymour vs Toronto Blue Jays

How the Toronto Blue Jays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ian Seymour's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ian Seymour's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .276vs RHH xwOBA .299Seasons 2026–2025
Changeup 30%Four-Seam Fastball 28%Sweeper 16%Sinker 12%Cutter 7%Slider 5%Curveball 1%Unknown 1%

How the Toronto Blue Jays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Toronto Blue Jays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ian Seymour, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 EC Ernie Clement SH .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ernie Clement
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KO Kazuma Okamoto RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kazuma Okamoto
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 VG Vladimir Guerrero Jr. RHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vladimir Guerrero Jr.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 443 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 AG Andrés Giménez LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrés Giménez
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GS George Springer RHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. George Springer
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 426 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 355 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 NL Nathan Lukes LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Lukes
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JS Jesús Sánchez LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jesús Sánchez
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 406 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MS Myles Straw RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Myles Straw
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AK Alejandro Kirk RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alejandro Kirk
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (16% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.