PITCHER MATCHUP

Hunter Greene vs Chicago Cubs

How the Chicago Cubs's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Hunter Greene's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Hunter Greene's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .285vs RHH xwOBA .275Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 54%Slider 34%Splitter 10%Sinker 1%Curveball 1%

How the Chicago Cubs's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago Cubs's top-9-by-AB hitters against Hunter Greene, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 AB Alex Bregman RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Bregman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (54% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 533 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (34% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 NH Nico Hoerner RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nico Hoerner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (54% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 549 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (34% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 PC Pete Crow-Armstrong LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pete Crow-Armstrong
    • Four-Seam Fastball (54% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (34% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 MB Michael Busch LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Busch
    • Four-Seam Fastball (54% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 573 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (34% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IH Ian Happ SH .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ian Happ
    • Four-Seam Fastball (54% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 596 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (34% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 SS Seiya Suzuki RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Seiya Suzuki
    • Four-Seam Fastball (54% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 462 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (34% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CK Carson Kelly RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Kelly
    • Four-Seam Fastball (54% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (34% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MC Michael Conforto LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Conforto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (54% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 429 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (34% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MA Miguel Amaya RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Amaya
    • Four-Seam Fastball (54% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (34% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.