PITCHER MATCHUP

Hunter Greene vs Chicago Cubs

How the Chicago Cubs's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Hunter Greene's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Hunter Greene's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .285vs RHH xwOBA .275Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 54%Slider 34%Splitter 10%Sinker 1%Curveball 1%

How the Chicago Cubs's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago Cubs's top-9-by-AB hitters against Hunter Greene, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 NH Nico Hoerner RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nico Hoerner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (54% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 594 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (34% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 PC Pete Crow-Armstrong LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pete Crow-Armstrong
    • Four-Seam Fastball (54% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 526 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (34% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 AB Alex Bregman RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Bregman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (54% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 566 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (34% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MB Michael Busch LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Busch
    • Four-Seam Fastball (54% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 612 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (34% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IH Ian Happ SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ian Happ
    • Four-Seam Fastball (54% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 628 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (34% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 SS Seiya Suzuki RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Seiya Suzuki
    • Four-Seam Fastball (54% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 496 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (34% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DS Dansby Swanson RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dansby Swanson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (54% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 493 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (34% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 CK Carson Kelly RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Kelly
    • Four-Seam Fastball (54% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 345 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (34% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MC Michael Conforto LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Conforto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (54% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 451 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (34% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.