PITCHER MATCHUP

Hunter Dobbins vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Hunter Dobbins's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Hunter Dobbins's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .319vs RHH xwOBA .298Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 37%Slider 22%Sweeper 12%Curveball 11%Splitter 10%Sinker 7%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Hunter Dobbins, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 540 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 481 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 381 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 JC Jackson Chourio SH .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 412 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 385 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 401 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 377 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .242 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.