PITCHER MATCHUP

Hunter Dobbins vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Hunter Dobbins's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Hunter Dobbins's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .320vs RHH xwOBA .303Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 37%Slider 22%Sweeper 12%Curveball 11%Splitter 10%Sinker 8%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Hunter Dobbins, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 588 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 521 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 412 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 449 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 335 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 341 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 416 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 437 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 SF Sal Frelick LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 528 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.