PITCHER MATCHUP

Hunter Dobbins vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Hunter Dobbins's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Hunter Dobbins's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .322vs RHH xwOBA .320Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 38%Slider 25%Sweeper 11%Curveball 11%Splitter 10%Sinker 6%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Hunter Dobbins, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 454 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ZN Zach Neto RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 414 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 514 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 MT Mike Trout RHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 428 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JS Jorge Soler RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Soler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JL Josh Lowe LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-22 game page →