PITCHER MATCHUP

Hunter Dobbins vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Hunter Dobbins's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Hunter Dobbins's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .320vs RHH xwOBA .303Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 37%Slider 22%Sweeper 12%Curveball 11%Splitter 10%Sinker 8%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Hunter Dobbins, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .306
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 452 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 494 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JL Josh Lowe LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.