PITCHER MATCHUP

Hunter Brown vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Hunter Brown's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Hunter Brown's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .297vs RHH xwOBA .263Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 34%Sinker 25%Knuckle Curve 18%Changeup 11%Slider 9%Cutter 3%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Hunter Brown, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .303
  1. 1 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (18% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 MM Marcelo Mayer LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcelo Mayer
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (18% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CK Christian Koss RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (18% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JC Jonah Cox RHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (18% usage) projects to .232 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (18% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 VB Victor Bericoto RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Bericoto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (18% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TH Turner Hill LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Turner Hill
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (18% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.