PITCHER MATCHUP

Hunter Brown vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Hunter Brown's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Hunter Brown's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .299vs RHH xwOBA .270Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 36%Sinker 23%Knuckle Curve 18%Changeup 11%Slider 8%Cutter 4%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Hunter Brown, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 586 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (18% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WA Willy Adames RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 589 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 355 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (18% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 399 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (18% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (18% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DS Daniel Susac RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Susac
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (18% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
  8. 8 CK Christian Koss RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (18% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 GM Grant McCray LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Grant McCray
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (18% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-11 game page →