PITCHER MATCHUP

Hayden Wesneski vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Hayden Wesneski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Hayden Wesneski's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .292vs RHH xwOBA .326Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 32%Sweeper 31%Sinker 15%Cutter 11%Changeup 8%Curveball 4%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Hayden Wesneski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .351
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .404 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 504 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 336 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 TG Trent Grisham LHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 430 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 547 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 418 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 JC José Caballero RHB .279
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 347 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 441 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AW Austin Wells LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 344 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-27 game page →