PITCHER MATCHUP

Hayden Wesneski vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Hayden Wesneski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Hayden Wesneski's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .300vs RHH xwOBA .314Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sweeper 30%Four-Seam Fastball 29%Sinker 16%Cutter 13%Changeup 9%Curveball 3%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Hayden Wesneski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .322
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .356
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .414 xwOBA over 347 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 355 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 587 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 531 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TG Trent Grisham LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC José Caballero RHB .278
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AW Austin Wells LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 372 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.