PITCHER MATCHUP

Hayden Wesneski vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Hayden Wesneski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Hayden Wesneski's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .297vs RHH xwOBA .324Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 31%Sweeper 31%Sinker 15%Cutter 11%Changeup 8%Curveball 4%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Hayden Wesneski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 461 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .246 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TP Tristan Peters LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 427 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 BM Braden Montgomery SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-02 game page →