PITCHER MATCHUP

Hayden Wesneski vs Tampa Bay Rays

How the Tampa Bay Rays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Hayden Wesneski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Hayden Wesneski's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .300vs RHH xwOBA .314Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sweeper 30%Four-Seam Fastball 29%Sinker 16%Cutter 13%Changeup 9%Curveball 3%

How the Tampa Bay Rays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Tampa Bay Rays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Hayden Wesneski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .304
  1. 1 JC Junior Caminero RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Junior Caminero
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 345 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 YD Yandy Díaz RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Yandy Díaz
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 502 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 449 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JA Jonathan Aranda LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonathan Aranda
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 419 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CS Chandler Simpson LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chandler Simpson
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 378 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 LH Liam Hicks LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Liam Hicks
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CM Cedric Mullins LHB .281
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cedric Mullins
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 520 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TW Taylor Walls SH .276
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Taylor Walls
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 392 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .236 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 JD Jonny DeLuca RHB .280
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonny DeLuca
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RP Richie Palacios LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Richie Palacios
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.