PITCHER MATCHUP

Hayden Wesneski vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Hayden Wesneski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Hayden Wesneski's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .324vs RHH xwOBA .332Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Sweeper 31%Sinker 14%Cutter 12%Changeup 5%Curveball 5%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Hayden Wesneski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 586 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WA Willy Adames RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 589 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 355 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 399 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DS Daniel Susac RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Susac
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
  8. 8 CK Christian Koss RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 GM Grant McCray LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Grant McCray
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-10 game page →