PITCHER MATCHUP

Hayden Wesneski vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Hayden Wesneski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Hayden Wesneski's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .324vs RHH xwOBA .332Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Sweeper 31%Sinker 14%Cutter 12%Changeup 5%Curveball 5%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Hayden Wesneski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 420 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 319 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 519 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MT Mike Trout RHB .361
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .275
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .240 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.