PITCHER MATCHUP

Hayden Wesneski vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Hayden Wesneski's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Hayden Wesneski's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .305vs RHH xwOBA .314Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sweeper 30%Four-Seam Fastball 30%Sinker 16%Cutter 13%Changeup 9%Curveball 3%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Hayden Wesneski, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .307
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 470 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .357
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 517 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.