PITCHER MATCHUP
Griffin Jax vs Athletics
How the Athletics's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Griffin Jax's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.
Griffin Jax's arsenal
Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .325vs RHH xwOBA .288Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sweeper 32%Changeup 22%Four-Seam Fastball 19%Sinker 17%Curveball 6%Cutter 3%Unknown 1%
How the Athletics's regulars project
Projected expected wOBA for each of the Athletics's top-9-by-AB hitters against Griffin Jax, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.
Lineup avg xwOBA .298
-
1 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .305
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
- Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (22% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 480 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (17% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (6% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (3% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
2 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .296
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
- Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (22% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 509 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (17% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (6% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (3% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
-
3 SL Shea Langeliers RHB .303
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shea Langeliers
- Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Changeup (22% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 427 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (17% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Curveball (6% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (3% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
4 HB Henry Bolte RHB .308
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Bolte
- Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (22% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (17% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (6% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (3% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
-
5 ZG Zack Gelof RHB .295
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zack Gelof
- Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (22% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (17% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (6% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Cutter (3% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
6 JH Jonah Heim SH .284
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Heim
- Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Changeup (22% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 487 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (17% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (6% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (3% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
7 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .301
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
- Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (22% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (17% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (6% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Cutter (3% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
8 MM Max Muncy RHB .282
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
- Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .242 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Changeup (22% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sinker (17% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Curveball (6% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
9 DW Donovan Walton LHB .311
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Donovan Walton
- Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (22% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (17% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (6% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (3% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-15 game page →