PITCHER MATCHUP

Griffin Jax vs Athletics

How the Athletics's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Griffin Jax's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Griffin Jax's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .318vs RHH xwOBA .297Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sweeper 31%Changeup 22%Four-Seam Fastball 19%Sinker 18%Curveball 6%Cutter 3%Unknown 1%

How the Athletics's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Athletics's top-9-by-AB hitters against Griffin Jax, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .298
  1. 1 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 497 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 525 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 SL Shea Langeliers RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shea Langeliers
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 438 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 HB Henry Bolte RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Bolte
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 ZG Zack Gelof RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zack Gelof
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JH Jonah Heim SH .281
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Heim
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 491 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MM Max Muncy RHB .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .241 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DW Donovan Walton LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Donovan Walton
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.