PITCHER MATCHUP

Griffin Jax vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Griffin Jax's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Griffin Jax's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .328vs RHH xwOBA .289Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sweeper 33%Changeup 22%Four-Seam Fastball 19%Sinker 16%Curveball 6%Cutter 4%Unknown 1%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Griffin Jax, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .305
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Sweeper (33% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 417 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .416 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JA Jo Adell RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Sweeper (33% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 456 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Sweeper (33% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 517 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MT Mike Trout RHB .354
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Sweeper (33% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 432 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JS Jorge Soler RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Soler
    • Sweeper (33% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .275
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Sweeper (33% usage) projects to .246 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Sweeper (33% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JL Josh Lowe LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Sweeper (33% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 WM Wade Meckler LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Sweeper (33% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.