PITCHER MATCHUP

Griffin Jax vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Griffin Jax's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Griffin Jax's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .325vs RHH xwOBA .288Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sweeper 32%Changeup 22%Four-Seam Fastball 19%Sinker 17%Curveball 6%Cutter 3%Unknown 1%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Griffin Jax, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .299
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 462 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .404 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 502 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .276
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.