PITCHER MATCHUP

Griffin Jax vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Griffin Jax's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Griffin Jax's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .327vs RHH xwOBA .271Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sweeper 35%Changeup 21%Four-Seam Fastball 20%Sinker 14%Cutter 5%Curveball 4%Unknown 1%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Griffin Jax, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Sweeper (35% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 416 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 ZN Zach Neto RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Sweeper (35% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 392 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 MT Mike Trout RHB .355
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Sweeper (35% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 406 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Sweeper (35% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 475 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .280
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Sweeper (35% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Sweeper (35% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Sweeper (35% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DW Donovan Walton LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Donovan Walton
    • Sweeper (35% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Sweeper (35% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (5% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.