PITCHER MATCHUP

Grant Holmes vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Grant Holmes's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Grant Holmes's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .338vs RHH xwOBA .314Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Slider 35%Four-Seam Fastball 31%Curveball 12%Cutter 11%Sinker 6%Changeup 4%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Grant Holmes, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 623 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 430 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .416 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 CK Christian Koss RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Jonah Cox RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.