PITCHER MATCHUP

Grant Holmes vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Grant Holmes's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Grant Holmes's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .339vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Slider 35%Four-Seam Fastball 32%Curveball 13%Cutter 11%Sinker 6%Changeup 4%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Grant Holmes, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .351
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 508 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 603 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 558 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 432 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 384 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TT Tim Tawa RHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Slider (35% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-15 game page →