PITCHER MATCHUP

Germán Márquez vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Germán Márquez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Germán Márquez's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .382vs RHH xwOBA .349Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 36%Knuckle Curve 33%Sinker 18%Slider 10%Changeup 3%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Germán Márquez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 610 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (33% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 563 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (33% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (33% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (33% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (33% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TT Tim Tawa RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (33% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (33% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (33% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JF Jose Fernandez RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Fernandez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (36% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (33% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (3% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.