PITCHER MATCHUP

George Klassen vs Miami Marlins

How the Miami Marlins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against George Klassen's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

George Klassen's arsenal

Throws RHPSeasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 37%Changeup 27%Slider 15%Sinker 13%Curveball 8%

How the Miami Marlins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Miami Marlins's top-9-by-AB hitters against George Klassen, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 OL Otto Lopez RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Otto Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 349 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (27% usage) projects to .235 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 XE Xavier Edwards SH .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xavier Edwards
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 451 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (27% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JM Jakob Marsee LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jakob Marsee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (27% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 KS Kyle Stowers LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Stowers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 358 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (27% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JS Javier Sanoja RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Sanoja
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (27% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 HH Heriberto Hernández RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heriberto Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (27% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 OC Owen Caissie LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Owen Caissie
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (27% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JM Joe Mack LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joe Mack
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (27% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 GC Griffin Conine LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Griffin Conine
    • Four-Seam Fastball (37% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (27% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-07 game page →