PITCHER MATCHUP

Gage Jump vs Colorado Rockies

How the Colorado Rockies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Gage Jump's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Gage Jump's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .346vs RHH xwOBA .321Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Slider 22%Curveball 11%Changeup 9%Sweeper 6%Sinker 5%

How the Colorado Rockies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Colorado Rockies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Gage Jump, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 358 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 HG Hunter Goodman RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Goodman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 363 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 MM Mickey Moniak LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mickey Moniak
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 KK Kyle Karros RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Karros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 CN Connor Norby RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Connor Norby
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .242 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 CC Cole Carrigg SH .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Carrigg
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.