PITCHER MATCHUP

Gage Jump vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Gage Jump's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Gage Jump's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .332vs RHH xwOBA .316Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Slider 22%Curveball 12%Changeup 9%Sweeper 6%Sinker 3%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Gage Jump, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 611 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JP Joc Pederson LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 EC Evan Carter LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 416 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .357
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 NL Nicky Lopez LHB .278
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nicky Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 ED Elias Díaz RHB .277
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Elias Díaz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.