PITCHER MATCHUP

Gage Jump vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Gage Jump's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Gage Jump's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .335vs RHH xwOBA .294Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 49%Slider 24%Curveball 11%Changeup 8%Sweeper 7%Sinker 1%Unknown 1%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Gage Jump, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JW James Wood LHB .366
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .413 xwOBA over 409 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CA CJ Abrams LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 317 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JY Jacob Young RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CM Curtis Mead RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Curtis Mead
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-17 game page →