PITCHER MATCHUP

Gage Jump vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Gage Jump's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Gage Jump's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .322vs RHH xwOBA .318Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Slider 22%Curveball 11%Changeup 9%Sweeper 6%Sinker 4%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Gage Jump, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 481 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .240 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JY Jacob Young RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DC Dylan Crews RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BH Brady House RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JT José Tena LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Tena
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.