PITCHER MATCHUP

Gage Jump vs Miami Marlins

How the Miami Marlins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Gage Jump's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Gage Jump's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .332vs RHH xwOBA .279Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Slider 25%Curveball 11%Changeup 8%Sweeper 7%Sinker 1%

How the Miami Marlins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Miami Marlins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Gage Jump, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 OL Otto Lopez RHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Otto Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .221 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 XE Xavier Edwards SH .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xavier Edwards
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 430 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JM Jakob Marsee LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jakob Marsee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 LH Liam Hicks LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Liam Hicks
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 KS Kyle Stowers LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Stowers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 OC Owen Caissie LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Owen Caissie
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JS Javier Sanoja RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Sanoja
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HH Heriberto Hernández RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heriberto Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JM Joe Mack LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joe Mack
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (25% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-05 game page →