PITCHER MATCHUP

Gage Jump vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Gage Jump's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Gage Jump's arsenal

Throws LHPvs RHH xwOBA .270Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 49%Slider 24%Curveball 12%Changeup 9%Sweeper 6%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Gage Jump, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 WA Willy Adames RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 561 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 RD Rafael Devers LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 538 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 LA Luis Arraez LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 614 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 MC Matt Chapman RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Chapman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 457 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CS Casey Schmitt RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Casey Schmitt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 359 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .410 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DS Daniel Susac RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Susac
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-24 game page →