PITCHER MATCHUP

Gage Jump vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Gage Jump's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Gage Jump's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .328vs RHH xwOBA .319Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Slider 22%Curveball 12%Changeup 8%Sweeper 7%Sinker 3%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Gage Jump, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 579 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WA Willy Adames RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 585 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .353
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .417 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DS Daniel Susac RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Susac
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 CK Christian Koss RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 GM Grant McCray LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Grant McCray
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.