PITCHER MATCHUP

Gage Jump vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Gage Jump's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Gage Jump's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .354vs RHH xwOBA .322Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Slider 22%Curveball 11%Changeup 9%Sweeper 6%Sinker 5%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Gage Jump, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .332
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 633 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 525 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 AP Andy Pages RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 490 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 337 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .404 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 505 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 431 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 TE Tommy Edman SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 WS Will Smith RHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Will Smith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 382 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 DR Dalton Rushing LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dalton Rushing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.