PITCHER MATCHUP

Gage Jump vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Gage Jump's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Gage Jump's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .338vs RHH xwOBA .327Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Slider 22%Curveball 11%Changeup 9%Sweeper 6%Sinker 5%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Gage Jump, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .324
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 625 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 580 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .362
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 510 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 323 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .400 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 400 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.