PITCHER MATCHUP

Gage Jump vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Gage Jump's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Gage Jump's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .354vs RHH xwOBA .322Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 47%Slider 22%Curveball 11%Changeup 9%Sweeper 6%Sinker 5%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Gage Jump, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 467 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .234 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 340 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 511 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Four-Seam Fastball (47% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.