PITCHER MATCHUP

Gabriel Hughes vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Gabriel Hughes's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Gabriel Hughes's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .306vs RHH xwOBA .273Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 48%Curveball 12%Changeup 11%Sinker 11%Slider 9%Sweeper 8%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Gabriel Hughes, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 MM Marcelo Mayer LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcelo Mayer
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CK Christian Koss RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC Jonah Cox RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 VB Victor Bericoto RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Bericoto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TH Turner Hill LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Turner Hill
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.