PITCHER MATCHUP

Gabriel Hughes vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Gabriel Hughes's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Gabriel Hughes's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .271vs RHH xwOBA .197Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 55%Slider 10%Changeup 10%Curveball 10%Sweeper 9%Sinker 5%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Gabriel Hughes, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .329
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .368
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (55% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 505 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (55% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 599 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (55% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 554 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (55% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 431 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (55% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (55% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (55% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 383 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (55% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TT Tim Tawa RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (55% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-10 game page →