PITCHER MATCHUP

Freddy Peralta vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Freddy Peralta's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Freddy Peralta's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .305vs RHH xwOBA .296Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 53%Changeup 21%Curveball 12%Slider 10%Sweeper 2%CS 2%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Freddy Peralta, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 546 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (2% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 488 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (2% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 418 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (2% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (2% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (2% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 385 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (2% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 405 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (2% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 SF Sal Frelick LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 511 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (2% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 DH David Hamilton LHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (2% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.