PITCHER MATCHUP

Freddy Peralta vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Freddy Peralta's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Freddy Peralta's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .305vs RHH xwOBA .288Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 53%Changeup 21%Curveball 12%Slider 11%Sweeper 2%CS 2%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Freddy Peralta, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 514 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (11% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 466 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (11% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (11% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 SF Sal Frelick LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 509 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (11% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC Jackson Chourio SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 384 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (11% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CY Christian Yelich LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 359 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (11% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 376 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (11% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .355
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .408 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (11% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-20 game page →