PITCHER MATCHUP

Freddy Peralta vs Athletics

How the Athletics's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Freddy Peralta's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Freddy Peralta's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .308vs RHH xwOBA .289Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 53%Changeup 21%Curveball 12%Slider 10%Sweeper 2%CS 2%

How the Athletics's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Athletics's top-9-by-AB hitters against Freddy Peralta, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 TS Tyler Soderstrom LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Soderstrom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (2% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 448 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (2% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JW Jacob Wilson RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Wilson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (2% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 458 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (2% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 JH Jonah Heim SH .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Heim
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (2% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 HB Henry Bolte RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Bolte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (2% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (2% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MM Max Muncy RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (2% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 AW Alika Williams RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alika Williams
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (21% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (10% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (2% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-10 game page →