PITCHER MATCHUP

Eury Pérez vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Eury Pérez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Eury Pérez's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .283vs RHH xwOBA .309Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 45%Slider 18%Sweeper 12%Changeup 9%Sinker 8%Curveball 8%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Eury Pérez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 602 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .280
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 JP Joc Pederson LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 EC Evan Carter LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .356
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 AO Alejandro Osuna LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alejandro Osuna
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 NL Nicky Lopez LHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nicky Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .241 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.