PITCHER MATCHUP

Eury Pérez vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Eury Pérez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Eury Pérez's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .308vs RHH xwOBA .318Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 49%Slider 19%Sweeper 11%Changeup 9%Curveball 8%Sinker 3%Cutter 1%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Eury Pérez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 560 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JJ Josh Jung RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB Jake Burger RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .280
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JP Joc Pederson LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 375 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 KH Kyle Higashioka RHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Higashioka
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AO Alejandro Osuna LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alejandro Osuna
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 JF Justin Foscue RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Foscue
    • Four-Seam Fastball (49% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.