PITCHER MATCHUP

Eury Pérez vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Eury Pérez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Eury Pérez's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .290vs RHH xwOBA .327Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Slider 19%Sweeper 11%Sinker 11%Changeup 8%Curveball 8%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Eury Pérez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 660 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 360 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 465 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JJ Josh Jung RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 NL Nicky Lopez LHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nicky Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .242 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JF Justin Foscue RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Foscue
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.