PITCHER MATCHUP

Eury Pérez vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Eury Pérez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Eury Pérez's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .277vs RHH xwOBA .310Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 45%Slider 18%Sweeper 12%Sinker 9%Changeup 9%Curveball 7%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Eury Pérez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .307
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 471 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JY Jacob Young RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 332 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DC Dylan Crews RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BH Brady House RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JT José Tena LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Tena
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-22 game page →