PITCHER MATCHUP

Eury Pérez vs New York Mets

How the New York Mets's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Eury Pérez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Eury Pérez's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .290vs RHH xwOBA .321Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Slider 19%Sweeper 11%Sinker 11%Changeup 9%Curveball 7%

How the New York Mets's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Mets's top-9-by-AB hitters against Eury Pérez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .333
  1. 1 BB Bo Bichette RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bo Bichette
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CB Carson Benge LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Benge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MS Marcus Semien RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcus Semien
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 520 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .240 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AE A.J. Ewing LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. A.J. Ewing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 BB Brett Baty LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brett Baty
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 362 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .240 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 FL Francisco Lindor SH .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Lindor
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 608 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JS Juan Soto LHB .410
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Juan Soto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .469 xwOBA over 468 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 350 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 FA Francisco Alvarez RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Alvarez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 JY Jared Young LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.