PITCHER MATCHUP

Eury Pérez vs Atlanta Braves

How the Atlanta Braves's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Eury Pérez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Eury Pérez's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .292vs RHH xwOBA .319Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Slider 19%Sweeper 11%Sinker 11%Changeup 8%Curveball 7%

How the Atlanta Braves's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Atlanta Braves's top-9-by-AB hitters against Eury Pérez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .326
  1. 1 MO Matt Olson LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Olson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 669 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 319 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 OA Ozzie Albies SH .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ozzie Albies
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 500 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 MH Michael Harris II LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Harris II
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 418 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 MD Mauricio Dubón RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mauricio Dubón
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 403 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 AR Austin Riley RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Riley
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 483 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DB Drake Baldwin LHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drake Baldwin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 RA Ronald Acuña Jr. RHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ronald Acuña Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 MY Mike Yastrzemski LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Yastrzemski
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 524 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 DS Dominic Smith LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dominic Smith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .242 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.