PITCHER MATCHUP

Eury Pérez vs Atlanta Braves

How the Atlanta Braves's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Eury Pérez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Eury Pérez's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .284vs RHH xwOBA .310Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 46%Slider 18%Sweeper 11%Changeup 9%Curveball 8%Sinker 7%

How the Atlanta Braves's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Atlanta Braves's top-9-by-AB hitters against Eury Pérez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .326
  1. 1 OA Ozzie Albies SH .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ozzie Albies
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 446 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 MO Matt Olson LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Olson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 611 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 MH Michael Harris II LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Harris II
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 383 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 MD Mauricio Dubón RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mauricio Dubón
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 369 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 AR Austin Riley RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Riley
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 431 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 DB Drake Baldwin LHB .353
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drake Baldwin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MY Mike Yastrzemski LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Yastrzemski
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 497 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 DS Dominic Smith LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dominic Smith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .234 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RA Ronald Acuña Jr. RHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ronald Acuña Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (7% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-05 game page →