PITCHER MATCHUP

Ethan Pecko vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Ethan Pecko's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Ethan Pecko's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .380vs RHH xwOBA .228Seasons 2026
Sinker 23%Four-Seam Fastball 21%Sweeper 19%Cutter 19%Curveball 13%Changeup 5%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Ethan Pecko, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 479 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 535 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JL Josh Lowe LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (19% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.