PITCHER MATCHUP

Erik Miller vs Athletics

How the Athletics's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Erik Miller's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Erik Miller's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .246vs RHH xwOBA .323Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 32%Slider 28%Four-Seam Fastball 22%Changeup 14%Sweeper 3%Unknown 1%

How the Athletics's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Athletics's top-9-by-AB hitters against Erik Miller, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .303
  1. 1 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 494 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 519 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 SL Shea Langeliers RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shea Langeliers
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 432 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 HB Henry Bolte RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Bolte
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 ZG Zack Gelof RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zack Gelof
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 JH Jonah Heim SH .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Heim
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 488 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DW Donovan Walton LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Donovan Walton
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AW Alika Williams RHB .280
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alika Williams
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (28% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (22% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (15% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.