PITCHER MATCHUP

Erick Fedde vs Minnesota Twins

How the Minnesota Twins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Erick Fedde's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Erick Fedde's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .357vs RHH xwOBA .314Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 31%Sweeper 30%Cutter 25%Changeup 13%Four-Seam Fastball 1%

How the Minnesota Twins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Minnesota Twins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Erick Fedde, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 BL Brooks Lee SH .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brooks Lee
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 JB Josh Bell SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Bell
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KC Kody Clemens SH .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kody Clemens
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 LK Luke Keaschall RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Keaschall
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BB Byron Buxton RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Byron Buxton
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 RL Royce Lewis RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Royce Lewis
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 TL Trevor Larnach LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trevor Larnach
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 VC Victor Caratini SH .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Caratini
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 RJ Ryan Jeffers RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Jeffers
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (30% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-29 game page →