PITCHER MATCHUP

Erick Fedde vs Detroit Tigers

How the Detroit Tigers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Erick Fedde's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Erick Fedde's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .358vs RHH xwOBA .310Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 31%Sweeper 31%Cutter 24%Changeup 13%Four-Seam Fastball 1%

How the Detroit Tigers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Detroit Tigers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Erick Fedde, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 KM Kevin McGonigle LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kevin McGonigle
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 DD Dillon Dingler RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dillon Dingler
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ST Spencer Torkelson RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Torkelson
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 RG Riley Greene LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Riley Greene
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 CK Colt Keith LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colt Keith
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .236 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 ZM Zach McKinstry LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach McKinstry
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 GT Gleyber Torres RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gleyber Torres
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HL Hao-Yu Lee RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hao-Yu Lee
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JB Javier Báez SH .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Báez
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.