PITCHER MATCHUP

Erick Fedde vs Detroit Tigers

How the Detroit Tigers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Erick Fedde's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Erick Fedde's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .362vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sweeper 32%Sinker 31%Cutter 24%Changeup 12%Four-Seam Fastball 1%

How the Detroit Tigers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Detroit Tigers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Erick Fedde, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 KM Kevin McGonigle LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kevin McGonigle
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 DD Dillon Dingler RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dillon Dingler
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ST Spencer Torkelson RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Torkelson
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 RG Riley Greene LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Riley Greene
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 CK Colt Keith LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colt Keith
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .233 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 ZM Zach McKinstry LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach McKinstry
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 HL Hao-Yu Lee RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hao-Yu Lee
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JB Javier Báez SH .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Báez
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MC Max Clark LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Clark
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.