PITCHER MATCHUP

Erick Fedde vs Detroit Tigers

How the Detroit Tigers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Erick Fedde's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Erick Fedde's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .358vs RHH xwOBA .310Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 31%Sweeper 29%Cutter 25%Changeup 13%Four-Seam Fastball 1%

How the Detroit Tigers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Detroit Tigers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Erick Fedde, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 KM Kevin McGonigle LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kevin McGonigle
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 RG Riley Greene LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Riley Greene
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .408 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 DD Dillon Dingler RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dillon Dingler
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ST Spencer Torkelson RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Torkelson
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CK Colt Keith LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colt Keith
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .242 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 ZM Zach McKinstry LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach McKinstry
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 GT Gleyber Torres RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gleyber Torres
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HL Hao-Yu Lee RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hao-Yu Lee
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JO James Outman LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Outman
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .214 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.