PITCHER MATCHUP

Erick Fedde vs Tampa Bay Rays

How the Tampa Bay Rays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Erick Fedde's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Erick Fedde's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .358vs RHH xwOBA .310Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 31%Sweeper 31%Cutter 24%Changeup 13%Four-Seam Fastball 1%

How the Tampa Bay Rays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Tampa Bay Rays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Erick Fedde, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .305
  1. 1 YD Yandy Díaz RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Yandy Díaz
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JC Junior Caminero RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Junior Caminero
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JA Jonathan Aranda LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonathan Aranda
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CS Chandler Simpson LHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chandler Simpson
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 LH Liam Hicks LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Liam Hicks
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CM Cedric Mullins LHB .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cedric Mullins
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 RP Richie Palacios LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Richie Palacios
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JD Jonny DeLuca RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonny DeLuca
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 NF Nick Fortes RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Fortes
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.